ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the level of five auto-antibodies including MCV and GPI in the serum of RA patients and assess the application value of five auto-antibodies in RA diagnosis.Methods The five auto-antibodies were detected by ELISA in serum samples of 150 patients with RA and 40 healthy controls,32 patients of SLE,30 patients of OA,20 patients of AS,20 patients of SS,20 patients of CTD.Results The positive rates of these five auto-antibodies in RA patients were significantly higher than in other group(X2=88.5,76.0,279.2,88.2,94.8,P＜0.05).Except anti-AKA,there was no the differences in the level of other antibodies among groups(X2=21.9,9.4,20.2,43.2,41.6,P＞0.05).Anti-MCV and anti-GPI has the highest sensitivity(78.0% and 83.3%),while anti-CCP has the highest specificity(97.1%)and anti-AKA has good specificity(96.1%)and lowest sensitivity(49.4%).When two antibodies were detected together,the sensitivity and specificity of MCV/CCP were highest(92.7% and 96.9%).When RF/GPI/CCP were detected together,the sensitivity and specificity were 90.7% and 96.9%,respectively.When RF/MCv/CCP were detected together,the sensitivity and specificity were 94.0% and 96.9%.Conclusions Anti-MCV and anti-GPI has the hishest sensitivity in laboratory diagnosis of RA,while anti-CCP has the highest specificity and anti-AKA have good specificity and lowest sensitivity.The combination detection can decrease the amount of missed diagnosis caused by single test. The combination detection of RF/GPI/CCP and RF/MCV/CCP will improve sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis to the RA patients.
ABSTRACT
This study was firstly conducted to detect antinuclear antibody(ANA) titer by using number influorescence density analysis assay instead of serum diluted assay. The best camera explore time was selected. Then 4,140 ANA positive sera were detected to determine the relationship between number influorescence density (detected by number camera system Spot 32 and computer analysis software ipwin32) and serum diluted titer. The consistent rates in different ANA patterns used by the two methods were compared. 4 seconds was found to be the best explore time and the relationship between number influorescence density and serum diluted titer was 29-50 vs 1:100, 51-85 vs 1:320, 86-175 vs 1:1000, 176-215 vs 1:3200, 216-237 vs 1:10,000. According to this standard we detected 3140 ANA positive sera by use of the two methods and observed a total consistency rate of 89.4%. The consistency rates of three ANA patterns including speckled, homogenous, mixture of speckled and homogenous were as high as 98.9%, 99.5%, 99.8% respectively. The lower consistency rate patterns included nucleolar (5.3%), centromere (1.8%), ribosome(12.6%) and other special patterns(0%). For practical purpose, number influorescence density analysis assay can be used in detecting the three main ANA patterns (speckled, homogeneous, mixture of speckled and homogenous) titer instead of serum diluted assay. The number influorescence density analysis assay is more objective, economical and simple than the serum diluted assay.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Antinuclear , Fluorescence , Fluoroimmunoassay , Methods , SoftwareABSTRACT
0 05)and the consistence rate of 3 000 sera tested by two methods were 99 4% totally, including 99 8%(mixture of speckled and homogeneous), 99 5%( homogeneous) and 99 0%( speckled), respectively Conclusion The difference of ANA results between laboratory caused by test condition such as fluorescence microscopy could be eliminated by using quality control with known fluorescence density So the ANA results may be more precise, reliable and comparable We could, thereby, holisticly improve the quality of ANA detection